Reconstruction of Maxillectomy Defect by Transport Distraction Osteogenesis (*)

The study aimed to explore the feasibility of posterior maxillectomy reconstruction by transport distraction in a primate model. In each of 14 male adult rhesus monkeys, posterior partial maxillectomy was performed on one side of maxilla to create a posterior maxillary defect. Immediately after the maxillectomy, a dentoalveolar segment anterior to the defect was osteotomized as transport segment and a custom-made transport distractor was fixed on the residual maxilla.
After a latency period of 5 days, the distractor was activated 1 mm daily to move the transport segment backward to the defect. The process lasted about 2 weeks. The transport segment was allowed to consolidate and the animals were sacrified at different defined intervals. Transport distraction was successful in six animals.
Three other cases were completed with minor wound dehiscence and one had a small oro-antral fistula with subsequent masillary sinusitis. New bone bridging the distraction gap was confirmed by radiography and histology in the animals completing distraction. Reconstruction of posterior maxillectomy defect is proven feasible by transport distraction osteogenesis.

A posterior maxillary defect created by partial maxillectomy in monkey.
Dissected dentoalveolus by maxillectomy.
Osteotomy cuts of the transport segment. Apical osteotomy cut. (arrow)
Vertical anterior osteotomy cut. (arrow)

The fixation of the distrator. Lateral view.

The fixation of the distrator. Frontal view.

The fixation of the distrator. Occlusal view.
Activation of the distractor to confirm the movement of the transport segment. Activation with an extension key.
Widened vertical anterior osteotomy gap following activation.

Regeneration of an edentulous alveolar ridge by transport distraction. Maxillary occlusal view shows the regenerated edentulous alveolar ridge by posterior transposition of the transport segment.
The harvested dentoalveolar specimen after distraction. A: Bucal view of the distraction gap. B: Occlusal view (arrows indicating the location of the regenerated alveolus).
Radiograph of the distracted dentoalveolus at 3 months of consolidation (the arrows indicating the regenerated bone). Scale bar length=1 cm.
Key words: distraction; osteogenesis; maxilla; reconstructive surgical procedures.

L. K. Cheung
Q. Zhang
Z.-G. Zhang
M. C. M. Wong
(*) Extraido de la revista "The International Journal of ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY" - 2003;32:515-522
   
volver atrás  Notas Anteriores  
Maxillary Distraction Using a Trans-sinusal Distractor: Technical Note (*)

In this pilot study, the principle of distraction osteogenesis was used to advance the midface of a boxer dog. A modified high Le Fort I-type osteotomy was performed. Following a latency period of 5 days the maxilla was distracted 14 mm in 14 consecutive days at a rate of 1 mm per day.
Ten weeks after the completion of the distraction, multiple biopsies were taken across the distraction gap. Histological observation showed bone deposition in the osteotomy sites. Soft and hard tissue formation resulted in complete healing across the distraction gap. The maxillary sinus was used to accommodate the distraction device. Superimposition of the standardized lateral cephalograms taken at the end of distraction and 14 months after the removal of the distractors showed no sign of relapse in the achieved sagital advancement of the maxilla.
This small, intraoral-trans-sinusal placed distractor has a completely new conceptual design, and may be helpful in distraction of maxilla in children and adults with midfacial hypoplasia.

Trans-Sinusal-Maxillary-Distractor (TS-MD), with two fixing plates and the distraction screw that makes an axis of a joint formed by the lower plate.
Illustration of th high Le Fort I-type osteotomy and the entry hole to the maxillary sinus.
TS-MD fixed on the right side. The distraction screw is located inside the maxillary sinus, while the upper plate ot the device is buried behind the inferior orbital nerve.
White arrows show hard silicon tubes approximately 2 cm in length and with a diameter that matched the head of the distraction screw. The distractors were activated intraorally through the silicone tube.

Lateral cephalogram at the beginning of the distraction.

Lateral cephalogram at the end of the distraction.

Lateral cephalogram 14 months after removal distractors.
Key words: distraction osteogenesis, midface, maxillary sinus, cleft lip and palate, bone tissue.

N. Nadjmi
R. Van Erum
J. Schoenaers
E. Schepers
(*) Extraido de la revista "The International Journal of ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY" - 2003;32:553-559
   
volver atrás  Notas Anteriores  

Treatment for an Endosseous Implant Migrated into the Maxillary Sinus Not Causing Maxillary Sinusitis: Case Report (*)

Placement of the endosseous implants in the maxilla has been proven to be a reliable treatment modality. If there is lack of supporting bone, the placed implant may not have enough primary stability and may migrate into the maxillary sinus. Displaced implants must be removed. If there are no signs of maxillary sinusitis, augmentation of the resulting alveolar defect can be performed during the same procedure.

Images of a 56-year-old man referred because of displacement of an implant into the maxillary sinus.

Clinical view of the patient showing 2 implants in the maxillary ridge.
Panoramic radiograph showing 1 implant in the right maxillary sinus and 2 implants in the maxilla.
Water's radiograph showing an implant in the right maxillary sinus in the region of the ostium. There were no signs of maxillary sinusitis.
After incision and reflection of the mucosa, the lateral maxillary sinus wall was inspected. The implant in the anterior region was mobile and was removed.

After osteotomy of the lateral maxillary sinus wall, the bone window was rotated upward. The displaced implant was removed after incision of the mucus membrane.

Harvesting of a graft from the mandibular symphysis.

Panoramic radiograph 3 month after grafting of the maxillary sinus floor. Note the augmentation in the canine/premolar region.
Panoramic radiograph 5 year after placement of the prosthesis.
Key words: endosseous dental implants, maxillary sinus, sinus augmentation.

Gerry M. Raghoebar, DDS, MD, PhD
Arjan Vissink, DDS, MD, PhD
(*) Extraido de la revista "The International Journal of ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS" - 2003;18:745-749
   
volver atrás  Notas Anteriores  


| Quiénes somos | Trabajos Científicos | Cursos & Conferencias | Enlaces |
| Agenda Personal | Notas Breves | Casos Clínicos | Informes | E-mail | Home |